What does each vendor state?
On 2026-09-29: Comp AI states 580+ integrations on its homepage. Vanta says it automatically pulls data from 400+ tools and lists 40+ AWS resources, 30+ Azure and 25+ GCP. Sprinto states continuous monitoring across 300+ integrations on its pricing page. Scytale's integrations page says it connects 100+ tools and its homepage says 150+; named examples include GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Google Workspace, JumpCloud, Okta, BambooHR, Greenhouse, Lever, MongoDB, ClickUp and AWS. Drata says hundreds of tools without a count. Delve publishes no count.
How do we score them?
Integrations carry 12% of our weight, scored on the published number: Comp AI 9.5, Vanta 9.0, Sprinto 8.0, Scytale 6.0, Drata 6.0 and Delve 4.0. Where a vendor's own pages disagree, as Scytale's do, we score the range. Where no number is published, we score lower, because a buyer cannot check breadth before a demo.
Why a count is not the whole answer
Counts are built differently. One vendor counts each cloud service as an integration; another counts a whole cloud provider as one. Some count HR and applicant-tracking systems, which matter for personnel controls; others focus on infrastructure. A lower count that covers your identity provider, cloud, code host and HR system can be worth more than a higher count that does not.
How should you check integrations?
List your systems of record: cloud accounts, identity provider, code repositories, ticketing, HR, device management and any customer-data stores. Check each against the vendor's integrations page. For each match, ask what the integration collects, how often, with which permissions, and whether it feeds automated control tests or only stores documents. For gaps, ask whether evidence can be uploaded manually and how that is tracked.
Do integrations matter more at framework two?
Yes. Each integration can feed several frameworks at once, so broad coverage pays back each time you add one. That is part of why integrations sit alongside framework depth in our criteria. It is also why a vendor that states cross-mapping with a smaller integration list can still add a framework cheaply: the controls already exist; only the new requirements need evidence.
What should you do with a missing integration?
Every platform will miss something, often a niche HR tool, an internal admin panel or an on-premises system. Ask three things. Can evidence be uploaded manually, and does the platform remind you when it is due, so the control does not quietly lapse? Can you build a custom integration or use an API, and on which plan? Scytale lists on-prem integrations on its Scale plan, Sprinto a custom API on Growth, and Drata custom connections on GRC Advanced. And does the vendor publish a request process for new integrations, with any commitment on timing? A manual evidence step for one system is manageable. A manual step for your identity provider or main cloud account is a reason to look at another platform, whatever the headline count says. Write the list of your systems into the quote request, so each vendor confirms coverage in writing rather than in a demo, and keep that list for the renewal, when your stack will have changed.